2022 Vol.5 Jun.No2

• Title: Research on the evaluation standard of classroom teaching effect from the perspective of
• Name: Jing Chen
• Company: (Sias International University, ZHENGZHOU ,HENAN, 451110,China)
• Abstract:

   In view of the current problem that the evaluation standard of the teaching effect of curriculum ideological and political education in China is not unified, which leads to the poor evaluation effect of classroom teaching effect, this paper puts forward the exploration method of the evaluation standard of classroom teaching effect from the perspective of "curriculum ideological and political education". Firstly, the functional structure of the teaching management model of curriculum ideological and political subject is optimized, the evaluation index of classroom teaching effect is constructed, the teaching evaluation algorithm is improved, and the teaching evaluation index is unified, Finally, the experiment proves that the evaluation standard of classroom teaching effect from the perspective of "curriculum ideological politics" has high practicality and effectiveness, and fully meets the research requirements.

  
  

• Keyword: Curriculum Ideology and politics; Classroom teaching; Teaching evaluation;
• DOI: 10.12250/jpciams2022090109
• Citation form: Jing Chen.Research on the evaluation standard of classroom teaching effect from the perspective of [J]. Computer Informatization and Mechanical System,2022,Vol.5,pp.48-54

[1] LIAN Jing，FANG Siyu，ZHOU Ya-u. 2020, Model Predictive Control of the Fuel Cell Cathode System Based on State Quantity Estimation.Computer Simulation, 37(07):119-122.

[2] Pan G, Shankararaman V, Koh K, Gan S. 2021,  Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2): 100501.

[3] Susanty L, Hartati Z, Sholihin R, Syahid A, Liriwati YF. 2021, Why English teaching truth on digital trends as an effort for effective learning and evaluation: opportunities and challenges: analysis of teaching English. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1): 303-316.

[4] Cook C, Jones J, Al-Twal A. 2022,  Validity and fairness of utilising student evaluation of teaching (SET) as a primary performance measure. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(2): 172-184.

[5]  De-kun J, Memon F H. 2022, Design of mobile intelligent evaluation algorithm in physical education teaching. Mobile Networks and Applications, 27(2): 527-534.

[6] Marks B, Thomas J. 2022,  Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory. Education and information technologies, 27(1): 1287-1305.

[7] Fawns T, Aitken G, Jones D. 2021,  Ecological teaching evaluation vs the datafication of quality: Understanding education with, and around, data. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(1): 65-82.

[8] Al-Maamari F S. 2021,  The potential in student evaluation of teaching for EFL teacher professional development. Cogent Education, 8(1): 1888670.

[9] YanRu L. 2021, An artificial intelligence and machine vision based evaluation of physical education teaching. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(2): 3559-3569.

[10] Peciuliauskiene P, Tamoliune G, Trepule E. 2022, Exploring the roles of information search and information evaluation literacy and pre-service teachers’ ICT self-efficacy in teaching. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1): 1-19.

[11] Sun X, Cai C, Pan S, Bao N, Liu N. 2021,A university teachers’ teaching performance evaluation method based on type-II fuzzy sets. Mathematics, 9(17): 2126.

[12] Weston T J, Hayward C N, Laursen S L. 2021, When seeing is believing: Generalizability and decision studies for observational data in evaluation and research on teaching. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(3): 377-398.

[13] Liu S. 2021,Research on the teaching quality evaluation of physical education with intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(5): 9227-9236.

[14] Man Z. 2022,  Research on the evaluation method for English teaching efficiency based on data mining. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 32(3): 295-312.

[15] Kim C M, Kwak E C. 2022,  An Exploration of a Reflective Evaluation Tool for the Teaching Competency of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers in Korea. Sustainability, 14(13): 8195.

[16] Chen R. 2021,Research on Teaching Quality Evaluation in Applied Undergraduate Universities. Creative Education, 12(10): 2322-2327.

[17] Wang N. 2021,Teaching Reform of Art Design Major Based on Obe Education Concept. Journal of Frontiers in Educational Research, 1(8): 13-16.

[18] Bi H H. 2022, Applying statistical process control to teaching quality assurance at higher education institutions. Quality Management Journal, 29(2): 145-157.

[19] Wang G, Williamson A. 2022, Course evaluation scores: valid measures for teaching effectiveness or rewards for lenient grading?. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(3): 297-318.

[20] Huang J, Shen G, Ren X. 2021,Connotation Analysis and Paradigm Shift of Teaching Design under Artificial Intelligence Technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(5): 73-86.