2023 Vol.6 Aug.N04 |
---|
|
Reference: [1]Fan M, Li Y. The application of computer graphics processing in visual communication design[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 39(4): 5183-5191. [2]Vandemeulebroecke M, Baillie M, Margolskee A, et al. Effective visual communication for the quantitative scientist[J]. CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2019, 8(10): 705-719. [3]Güney Z. Visual literacy and visualization in instructional design and technology for learning environments[J]. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2019, 8(1): 103-117. [4]Wiesenberg M, Verčič D. The status quo of the visual turn in public relations practice[J]. Communications, 2021, 46(2): 229-252. [5]Andriyan W, Anesti V. Visual audio communication design on the role of information technology on student life style of universitas raharja[J]. ADI J. Recent Innov, 2020, 2(1): 15-24. [6]Sampietro A. Use and interpretation of emoji in electronic-mediated communication: A survey[J]. Visual Communication Quarterly, 2020, 27(1): 27-39. [7]Maydell E. The visual representation of indigenous cultural identities in Australian and New Zealand tourism campaigns[J]. Visual Communication Quarterly, 2020, 27(4): 183-195. [8]Schlosser R W, Brock K L, Koul R, et al. Does animation facilitate understanding of graphic symbols representing verbs in children with autism spectrum disorder?[J]. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2019, 62(4): 965-978. [9]Schloss K B, Leggon Z, Lessard L. Semantic discriminability for visual communication[J]. Ieee transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 2020, 27(2): 1022-1031. [10]Morin O, Kelly P, Winters J. Writing, graphic codes, and asynchronous communication[J]. Topics in cognitive science, 2020, 12(2): 727-743. [11]Jenzen O, Erhart I, Eslen-Ziya H, et al. The symbol of social media in contemporary protest: Twitter and the Gezi Park movement[J]. Convergence, 2021, 27(2): 414-437. [12]Fernández L. Images that liberate: Moral shock and strategic visual communication in animal liberation activism[J]. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 2021, 45(2): 138-158. [13]Judge S, Randall N, Goldbart J, et al. The language and communication attributes of graphic symbol communication aids–a systematic review and narrative synthesis[J]. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2020, 15(6): 652-662. [14]Light J, McNaughton D, Caron J. New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions[J]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2019, 35(1): 26-41. [15]Lelis C, Leitao S, Mealha O, et al. Typography: the constant vector of dynamic logos[J]. Visual Communication, 2022, 21(1): 146-170. |
Tsuruta Institute of Medical Information Technology
Address:[502,5-47-6], Tsuyama, Tsukuba, Saitama, Japan TEL:008148-28809 fax:008148-28808 Japan,Email:jpciams@hotmail.com,2019-09-16