location:Home > 2023 Vol.6 Aug.N04 > Evaluation of the Efficiency of Regional Emergency Supply Chain under the Background of COVID-19 Prevention and Control

2023 Vol.6 Aug.N04

  • Title: Evaluation of the Efficiency of Regional Emergency Supply Chain under the Background of COVID-19 Prevention and Control
  • Name: Li Wei1, 2*, Wang Kai3
  • Company: Li Wei1, 2*, Wang Kai3 (1.Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Bei Jing 100038, China; 2. College of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technlogy, Taiyuan 030024, China; 3. School of Political Science and Public Manage
  • Abstract:

    Based on the characteristics of the emergency supply chain, the work process of the emergency supply chain can be divided into the production and configuration stages of relief supplies when dealing with emergencies. Under the Background of COVID-19 Prevention and Control, an Evaluation Index System is constructed for Rescue Efficiency of Emergency Supply Chain. The overall efficiency, production efficiency and configuration efficiency of the emergency supply chain in 25 countries have been virtually measured by an improved two-stage network DEA model. The results show that the model can evaluate and compare the rescue efficiency of the regional emergency supply chain, and locate the invalid stages. It can be used to improve the overall layout of the emergency supply chain and improve its work efficiency.


  • Keyword: Emergency Supply Chain; Efficiency Evaluation; COVID-19; Two-Stage Network DEA Model
  • DOI: 10.12250/jpciams2023090617
  • Citation form: Li Wei.Evaluation of the Efficiency of Regional Emergency Supply Chain under the Background of COVID-19 Prevention and Control [J]. Computer Informatization and Mechanical System,2023,Vol.6,pp.73-78
Reference:

[1] Daud M S, Hussein M Z S M, Nasir M E, et al. Humanitarian logistics and its challenges: the literature review [J]. Intemational jounal of supply chain management, 2016, 5(3).

[2] Jian HFarzad A, Dmitry I, et al. A Real-Option Approach to Mitigate Disruption Risk in the Supply Chain [J]. Omega, 2018, 88: 133-149.

[3] Euler Hermes. Global Supply Chain Survey-Insearch of Post-Covid-19 Resilience [EB/OL]. https://www.eulerhermes.com/en_global/APAC/apac-economic-research/Global-Supply-Chain-Survey-In-search-of-post-Covid-19-resilience.html. (2020-12-10) [2021-01-09].

[4] Cozzolino A. springerbriefs in business: humanitarian logistics [M]. [S.I.]: Springer, 2012.

[5] Aakil M C, Nie X F, Shaligram P. Optimization models in emergency logistics: a literature review [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2012, 46(1): 4-13.

[6] Xu S, Zhang X, Feng L, et al. Disruption risks in supply chain management: a literature review based on bibliometric analysis [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2020(1): 1-19.

[7] Paul D. Berger, Arthur Gersten feld, Amy Z. Zeng. How many suppliers are best? A ecision-analysis approach [J]. Omega, 2004, 1.

[8] Jabbar Zadeh AHaughton MKhosrojerdi A. closed-loop supply chain network design under disruption risks: a robust approach with real world application [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 116: 178-191.

[9] Dolgui A, Ivanov D, Sokolov B. Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56(1-2): 414-430.

[10] Hossein S, Ata A T, Reza T M. An EOQ model with random disruption and partial backordering [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(9): 2600-2609.

[11] Mohammaddust F, Rezapour S, Farahani R Z, et al. Developing lean and responsive supply chains: A robust model for alternative risk mitigation strategies in supply chain designs [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 183(C): 632-653.

[12] Zhang D H, Sheng Z H, Du J G, et al. A study of emergency management of supply chain under supply disruption [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2014, 24(1): 13-20.

[13] Zhang S T, Li X, Zhang C Y. A fuzzy control model for restraint of bullwhip effect in uncertain closed-loop supply chain with hybrid recycling channels [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 25(2): 475-482.

[14] Namdar JLi XSawhney R, et al. Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56(6): 2339-2360.

[15] Pettit S, Beresford A. Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains [J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Lgistics Management, 2009, 39(6): 450-468.

[16] Sohn S Y, Su I C. Fuzzy QFD for supply chain management with reliability consideration [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 72(3): 327-334.

[17] Chawis B, Mikharu A A, Takumi As. Facility location optimization model for emergency humanitarian logistics [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 24: 485-498.

[18] Seyyed-Mahdi, Hosseini-Motlagh, Mohammad R G S, et al. Toward a coordination of inventory and distribution schedules for blood in disasters [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2020, 72: 100897.

[19] Nick L, Felipe A V. Points of distribution location and inventory management model for post-disaster humanitarian logistics [J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2018, 116: 1-24.

[20] Reza S, Abbas S, Reza R K. Inventory routing and dynamic redistribution of relief goods in post-disaster operations [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020(140): 106219.

[21] Amlan K. M, Sounak S, Prasun D, et al. A cost optimization model and solutions for shelter allocation and relief distribution in flood scenario [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018(31): 1187-1198.

[22] Bruni M E, Beraldi P, Khodaparasti S. A fast heuristic for routing in post-disaster humanitarian relief logistics [J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2018(30): 304-313.

[23] Seyed R A, Amir AMasoud R. Prepositioning and distributing relief items in humanitarian logistics with uncertain parameters [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2020: 100933.

[24] Saurav N. Supply chain efficiency framework to improve business performance in a competitive era [J]. Management Research Review. 2020, 44(3): 477-508.

[25] Hu Y, Li B, Zha Y, et al. How monetary policies and ownership structure affect bank supply chain efficiency: a DEA-based case study [J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2020, 121(4): 750-769.

[26] Han C L, Zhang Q. Optimization of supply chain efficiency management based on machine learning and neural network [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2021,33(5): 1419-1433.

[27] Kim C, Kim H J. A study on healthcare supply chain management efficiency: using bootstrap data envelopment analysis [J]. Health Care Management Science, 2019, 22(3): 534-548.

[28] Pankaj M. Madhani. Enhancing supply chain efficiency and effectiveness with lean Six Sigma approach [J]. International Journal of Project Management and Productivity Assessment, 2020, 8(1): 40-65.

[29] Färe R., Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach [J]. Economics Letters, 1996, 50(1): 65-70.

[30] Kao C. Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: a relational model [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192(3): 949-962.

[31] Global COVID-19 big data analysis platform. https://www.zq-ai.com/#/fe/xgfybigdata. [2021-08-15]


Tsuruta Institute of Medical Information Technology
Address:[502,5-47-6], Tsuyama, Tsukuba, Saitama, Japan TEL:008148-28809 fax:008148-28808 Japan,Email:jpciams@hotmail.com,2019-09-16